Research / graceful-spider-three-arms

Three equal long arms: zero-rotatability at lengths three, four and seven

You are reading a fixed version. Read the current version

Certificate proofs for S(k,k,k,1^m), k in {3,4,7}, all integers m >= 1; internal review and unresolved publication priority.

Result and scope

For each k in {3,4,7} and integer m >= 1, S(k,k,k,1^m) is 0-rotatable: every prescribed vertex can receive zero in a graceful labeling. These are exactly three equal long arms and additional center leaves. No assertion is made for m=0, other lengths, other numbers of long arms, all spiders, or an alpha-labeling at every prescribed zero.

The existing note for lengths three and four and the separate K7 note give explicit base certificates and the leaf-insertion proof. The K7 proof uses five bases and four complements to cover nine zero orbits. The unbounded claim follows from the written interval argument; finite checker runs are diagnostics.

Earlier work

Brandon J. Patterson's 2017 master's thesis is now available in full. Theorem 3.3.8, printed pp. 13–14, already establishes alpha-gracefulness for all these families. Conjecture 5.4.4 is broader. Gracefulness and prescribed-zero rotatability are distinct. Patterson's other results also yield several K7 zero positions as deductions described in the K7 note. The exact all-m arbitrary-zero claim has unresolved publication priority; no novelty of the families, certificates, or gap-insertion method is claimed. The former full-text access gap is closed.

Evidence and review

The public repository holds the existing certificates and historical V1 note copies. The K7 repository files supply the separate certificate proof and reproducibility records. The existing note's proof download remains its own artifact; The separate K7 proof archive has SHA-256 f5bc44be564bdf7e2c3ad648e023c03ebd203c52873c35cb76c6e156cad0048e. Checks are internal AI-assisted project checks, with no external peer review or proof-assistant verification. EN/DE/ZH language statuses remain draft until their corresponding human review is documented.

Statements & evidence

SPIDER-333-LEAVES-0-ROTATABLE Proof provided

For every integer m >= 1, S(3,3,3,1^m) is 0-rotatable: every prescribed vertex can receive label zero in a graceful labeling.

Formal verification
No formal verification
Review status
Internal check
Evidence
Five m=1 label certificates and the fixed-threshold insertion lemma; independent internal audit in graceful-spider-three-arms-proof.zip (SHA-256 86b4e0f5c01a8f43a4579894e891a3ef362c675280ca70a75b9df790b064b549), audit.md.
Scope
Exactly three arms of length three and at least one additional center leaf; all integer m >= 1. No result for arbitrary spiders or arbitrary numbers of length-three arms. Publication priority unresolved.
Assumptions
Graceful labels use each integer 0..m+9 once; edge differences use 1..m+9 once. The graph is S(3,3,3,1^m).
Toolchain
Elementary written induction; Python 3.12.1 checks the base certificates and finite invariant instances. No formal proof assistant.
Reviewer
Independent internal AI mathematical audit, 8 October 2026; no external or peer reviewer.

SPIDER-444-LEAVES-0-ROTATABLE Proof provided

For every integer m >= 1, S(4,4,4,1^m) is 0-rotatable: every prescribed vertex can receive label zero in a graceful labeling.

Formal verification
No formal verification
Review status
Internal check
Evidence
Six m=1 label certificates and the fixed-threshold insertion lemma; independent internal audit in graceful-spider-three-arms-proof.zip (SHA-256 86b4e0f5c01a8f43a4579894e891a3ef362c675280ca70a75b9df790b064b549), audit-k4.md.
Scope
Exactly three arms of length four and at least one additional center leaf; all integer m >= 1. No result for arbitrary spiders or other arm lengths. Publication priority unresolved.
Assumptions
Graceful labels use each integer 0..m+12 once; edge differences use 1..m+12 once. The graph is S(4,4,4,1^m).
Toolchain
Elementary written induction; Python 3.12.1 checks the six base certificates and finite invariant instances. No formal proof assistant.
Reviewer
Independent internal AI mathematical audit, 8 October 2026; no external or peer reviewer.

SPIDER-777-LEAVES-0-ROTATABLE Proof provided

For every integer m >= 1 and every vertex v of S(7,7,7,1^m), there exists a graceful labeling f with f(v)=0.

Formal verification
No formal verification
Review status
Internal check
Evidence
Five bases, four complements and the written interval insertion proof cover nine zero orbits for all m >= 1. Proof archive SHA-256 f5bc44be564bdf7e2c3ad648e023c03ebd203c52873c35cb76c6e156cad0048e; download /downloads/8; repository commit 4aca7989c752870b353fcd40d43895ab54d073fe, k7/. Internal checkers and diagnostics in REPRO-REPORT.md.
Scope
Exactly three seven-edge long arms and m >= 1 center leaves. No m=0, other lengths, other arm counts, arbitrary spiders, alpha-labeling for every zero vertex, or novelty/priority assertion.
Assumptions
The graph is S(7,7,7,1^m), m >= 1, q=21+m; labels bijectively use 0..q, edge differences use 1..q once. A different labeling may be used for each chosen vertex.
Toolchain
Written elementary proof; exact Python checkers run with Python 3.12.1; diagnostics recorded in REPRO-REPORT.md. Python 3.10+ required. No proof assistant.
Reviewer
Separate internal AI mathematical review and checker, 9 October 2026; no external or peer reviewer.

Contributions & AI assistance

Contributions

The note gives explicit certificates for all nine zero-vertex orbits and a proof for every m≥1. Patterson (2017) already covers α-gracefulness and, through a leaf-reduction deduction, several zero positions; no worldwide novelty or publication priority is claimed. Jordi Gartner is responsible for the editorial publication.

AI assistance

AI assistance contributed to searches, proof development and checking, code checks, preparation of the text, and the German and Chinese translation drafts. The mathematical reviews are internal and do not constitute external peer review or formal verification.

References

  1. Brandon J. Patterson, *New Classes of Graceful Spiders and Related Computational Results*, master's thesis, Ball State University, May 2017.
  2. A. Panpa, S. Imnang, T. Wasuanankul, *Graceful Labeling of Spider Graphs With at Most Five Legs*, Journal of Applied Mathematics (2025), DOI 10.1155/jama/5826777.
  3. Songling Shan, Yucheng Zhong, *Graceful Labeling of Two Families of Spiders*, arXiv:2605.14295v2 (2026).
  4. Rafael I. Rofa, *0-rotatability of classes of rooted symmetric trees. Are rooted symmetric trees 0-rotatable?*, arXiv:2312.16235 (2023).
  5. Patrick Bahls, Sara Lake, Andrew Wertheim, *Gracefulness of families of spiders*, Involve 3 (2010).
  6. Bogdan Dumitru, Mihai Nacu, *Alternating Extremes in Graceful Labelings of Full Binary Trees and Spider Trees*, arXiv:2607.12597 (2026).
  7. Tong Niu, *Graceful labelings of spiders with three-edge legs and pendant leaves at the center*, arXiv:2605.02303 (2026).

Related releases

  1. A certificate-and-composition proof of 0-rotatability for S(k^n,1^m), k in {3,5,7,9,11}, n >= 2, m >= 0. Established ingredients and prior subfamilies are credited; publication priority remains unresolved.

    · Research note

  2. For every even K≥20, attach two K-edge arms to the chosen zero-labeled root of any finite graph H with a supplied conventional graceful labeling. On either new arm, each depth 2≤d≤D8(K) separately admits a conventional graceful labeling with zero at that vertex. The guaranteed depth interval grows without bound.

    · Research note

  3. For every integer k≥19, all n≥2,m≥0 and any selected long arm of S(k^n,1^m), each depth 2≤d≤D8(k) can receive zero in a graceful labeling. Separate requests may use separate labelings. The explicit sufficient prefix includes both length parities and has limiting proportion 10/11; no optimality or historical priority is claimed.

    · Research note

  4. For any finite graph H with a conventional graceful labeling and a chosen root labeled 0, attach two named arms of K=23+24t edges, where t≥1. On each new arm, a separate conventional graceful labeling can place zero at depth 20+22t or 21+22t.

    · Research note

  5. For k=23+24t, n≥2 and m≥0, every selected named long-arm vertex at depth 17+20t through 20+22t can be zero in its own graceful labeling for every integer t≥0. For t≥1, the same holds at the additional depth 21+22t. For t≥2, it also holds at depth 22+22t. Consequently, for t≥5 the q24/D8 prefix and q48 point combine to give all depths 1≤d≤22+22t.

    · Research note

  6. Given a finite graph with a supplied graceful labeling that assigns zero to a chosen root, attach two new 119-edge arms there. Every interior depth 1–118 on either arm can receive zero in its own labeling. The source also proves eight specified near-tip depths for K=30·4^r−1, r≥1.

    · Research note

  7. Given any finite graph with a conventional graceful labeling that assigns zero to a chosen root, attach two 95-edge arms at that root. Each interior vertex on either new arm can receive zero in its own graceful labeling.

    · Research note

  8. For every integer m≥1 and every prescribed vertex of S(7,7,7,1^m), there exists a graceful labeling that assigns zero to that vertex. Five base certificates, four complements, and a leaf-insertion lemma prove the result; publication priority remains unresolved.

    · Research note

  9. For every n ≥ 2 and m ≥ 0, each actual vertex of S(23^n,1^m) can be assigned zero in a graceful labeling, with a separate labeling for each selected vertex.

    · Research note

  10. For every n ≥ 2 and m ≥ 0, every actual vertex of S(25^n,1^m) can receive zero in a graceful labeling, with a separate labeling for each selected vertex.

    · Research note

  11. For every n ≥ 2 and m ≥ 0, each actual vertex of S(47^n,1^m) can be the unique zero in a graceful labeling; a separate labeling may be used for each target.

    · Research note

  12. For every n ≥ 2 and m ≥ 0, each actual vertex of S(71^n,1^m) can be the unique zero in a graceful labeling; a separate labeling may be used for each target.

    · Research note

  13. For every n≥2 and m≥0, each vertex of S(95^n,1^m)—the hub, any of its m original leaves, or any position on any named 95-edge arm—can be assigned zero in its own graceful labeling.

    · Research note

  14. For every even k ≥ 2, n ≥ 2, and m ≥ 0, each named vertex of S(k^n,1^m) can receive zero in a graceful labeling, with a separate labeling for each chosen vertex.

    · Research note

  15. For every integer m >= 1, both S(3,3,3,1^m) and S(4,4,4,1^m) are 0-rotatable. Eleven explicit base labelings and one threshold-insertion lemma give a written proof for all m.

    · Research note

Version history

VersionPublishedChange note
v12Added a contiguous prescribed-zero prefix for every integer arm length k≥19 with limiting proportion 10/11, completed additional residue classes and supplied explicit depth bounds and reproducible proof sources.
v11Adjusted the link to the growing-depth research note to match each page’s language.
v10Adds a construction for prescribed zeros at long-arm depths 4s and 4s + 1 in S(k^n,1^m), where k = 2r + 1, s ≥ 1, r ≥ 3s, r ≠ 3s + 1, n ≥ 2, and m ≥ 0. The number of guaranteed depths grows with k; this is not a full zero-rotatability result. The two zero positions use separate spider labelings.
v9Corrected wording about the existing note and the separate K7 proof archive in English and German.
v8Removed repeated literature caveats and clarified the role of finite program checks.
v7Added a proof note for the five odd arm lengths k = 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11, for n ≥ 2 and m ≥ 0.
Archived wording

Adds a separate two-parameter family note for k in {3,5,7,9,11}, n >= 2, m >= 0. The previous k=3,4 and K7 notes retain their own versions and archives. Publication priority unresolved; DE/ZH remain translation drafts.

v6Added the separate K7 certificate proof and extended the project scope to k in {3,4,7}, m >= 1; corrected Patterson full-text availability and prior alpha-gracefulness. DE/ZH remain translation drafts.
v5Clarified AI roles in the research, proof development and checks, internal review scope, and editorial responsibility.
v4Set School Scotty as the research-program signature and clarified Jordi Gartner's editorial responsibility and the specific AI contributions.
v3Added German and Chinese translations of the existing claim evidence, scope, assumptions, toolchain and reviewer information. The claims, proofs, statuses and English source text are unchanged; the review status stayed the same.
Archived wording

Added German and Chinese translations for existing claim evidence, scope, assumptions, toolchain and reviewer metadata only; no claim, proof, status, source text or review-status promotion.

v2Revised the English, German and Chinese project overview and linked the existing research note and public repository; the theorem claims, evidence and references are unchanged.
v1Initial project page for two internally audited 0-rotatability theorems, for three long arms of length three or four with m>=1 center leaves; novelty and priority remain unresolved.

Comments

Discussion of version 6

No comments yet.

Comments on this version are preserved here. Comment on the current version →